Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRBrQ4WKN5UYFscEnYaHm5Kgr-_HXe8GzO+-Kg6tiB5Mg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Does anyone object to me backpatching this? It seems to me kinda crazy
> to have --verbose hardcoded on the back branches and not on the dev branch.

+1. A maximum of consistency with the test code when possible is nice to have.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION,query cancellations and slot handling)