Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS
Date
Msg-id 17493.1494598063@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Does anyone object to me backpatching this? It seems to me kinda crazy
>> to have --verbose hardcoded on the back branches and not on the dev branch.

> +1. A maximum of consistency with the test code when possible is nice to have.

No objection here either.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications