Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32function names from error messages? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32function names from error messages?
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqR7mWJBFqHSPZj1LrhNbF+9V-6eep=P7=uTnJLKRda8ug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32 function namesfrom error messages?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32function names from error messages?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I'm rather inclined to choose Option 1 to reduce message translation work.  Actually, is the Option 3 the best so
thatit aligns with the existing messages by putting the error code in the primary message?
 

I find it hard to have an opinion on the matter as a non-translator.
Why not asking translators directly on pgsql-translators?
-- 
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32 function namesfrom error messages?
Next
From: Rushabh Lathia
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Gather Merge