Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32function names from error messages? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32function names from error messages?
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F699D4F@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32function names from error messages?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> I find it hard to have an opinion on the matter as a non-translator.
> Why not asking translators directly on pgsql-translators?
> 

I didn't think of pgsql-translators.  I'll ask the same question there.  Thanks.

Anyway, this is also a matter of source code style, and those who commit the code live here, so I think I need to hear
opinionshere, too.
 

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 0/NULL/NIL assignments in build_*_rel()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] Should I embed or parameterize syscall/Win32 function names from error messages?