Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQHoiUmH4dc_Psw5+29ftVyFGy1RLv=knsWsaYD2YWWzQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
>
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item.  Alvaro,
>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>> item.
>
> That's correct.  Since we already had a patch available, I pushed it.
> I'll wait for a few days before marking the open item as closed in the
> wiki, to make sure that hamster reports success a few times.

Thanks. I just did a couple of additional manual tests on hamster, and
the sporadic failure does not show up anymore, so the daily runs
should be in good shape now for this test.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Karl O. Pinc"
Date:
Subject: PQsendQuery+PQgetResult+PQsetSingleRowMode limitations and support
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: OOM in libpq and infinite loop with getCopyStart()