Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ1zOzRbbRD+aVOBanPuciq3H561XTXKUX97UjS72v+cQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Noah Misch wrote:
>>
>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item.  Alvaro,
>>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>>> item.
>>
>> That's correct.  Since we already had a patch available, I pushed it.
>> I'll wait for a few days before marking the open item as closed in the
>> wiki, to make sure that hamster reports success a few times.
>
> Thanks. I just did a couple of additional manual tests on hamster, and
> the sporadic failure does not show up anymore, so the daily runs
> should be in good shape now for this test.

The failing test has passed 7 days in a row, so I am marking this
issue as fixed.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()