Re: New versioning scheme - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: New versioning scheme
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ4ugcpD6BbWxp-RtZb4FuEX0koBwYY+mYqux8UeH-FMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New versioning scheme  (Chris Mair <chris@1006.org>)
Responses Re: New versioning scheme  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Chris Mair <chris@1006.org> wrote:
> is renaming the current 9.6 as 10 still an option, now that 9.6 beta 1 has
> been released?

Point of history: there has been 8.5 alpha 1, 2 and 3 before it was
renamed to 9.0.

(No opinion on the debate to offer to be honest)
--
Michael


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Chris Mair
Date:
Subject: Re: New versioning scheme
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: When should be advocate external projects?