Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive. - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive.
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ29vBFsENQg6V_G4QQmb9zP6beYOycAMusJUNF-Gj5rg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive.  (t.katsumata1122@gmail.com)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive.  (Tomonari Katsumata <t.katsumata1122@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-docs
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:27 PM,  <t.katsumata1122@gmail.com> wrote:
> At "recovery_target_inclusive (boolean)", nothing is mentioned about
> "recovery_target_lsn".
> It should be fixed, since "recovery_target_lsn" is affected by the value of
> "recovery_target_inclusive".
>
> Could you check this?

Apologies. You are right, this is a documentation bug and should be
fixed. Attached is a patch to address the problem. The trend on the
documentation page for recovery parameters is to list the options
alphabetically, so recovery_target_lsn comes first.
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: t.katsumata1122@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive.
Next
From: Tomonari Katsumata
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive.