Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sam Saffron
Subject Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3
Date
Msg-id CAAtdryM--1JVJmV4L+cZdX0igW62yhN=b4wQ2nSuVGq1NvawuQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3
Re: Failure upgrading PG 9.2 to 9.3
List pgsql-general
I am getting the following failure on a customer DB upgrading 9.2 to 9.3

Selecting previously unselected package postgresql-9.2.
Unpacking postgresql-9.2 (from
.../postgresql-9.2_9.2.8-1.pgdg12.4+1_amd64.deb) ...
Processing triggers for postgresql-common ...
Setting up postgresql-client-9.2 (9.2.8-1.pgdg12.4+1) ...
Setting up postgresql-9.2 (9.2.8-1.pgdg12.4+1) ...
Creating new cluster 9.2/main ...
  config /etc/postgresql/9.2/main
  data   /var/lib/postgresql/9.2/main
  locale C
  port   5433
 * Starting PostgreSQL 9.2 database server
   ...done.
 * Stopping PostgreSQL 9.2 database server
   ...done.
 * Stopping PostgreSQL 9.3 database server
   ...done.
Performing Consistency Checks
-----------------------------
Checking cluster versions                                   ok
SQL command failed
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE info_rels (reloid) AS SELECT c.oid FROM
pg_catalog.pg_class c JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace n   ON
c.relnamespace = n.oid LEFT OUTER JOIN pg_catalog.pg_index i   ON
c.oid = i.indexrelid WHERE relkind IN ('r', 'm', 'i', 'S') AND
i.indisvalid IS DISTINCT FROM false AND  i.indisready IS DISTINCT FROM
false AND   ((n.nspname !~ '^pg_temp_' AND     n.nspname !~
'^pg_toast_temp_' AND     n.nspname NOT IN ('pg_catalog',
'information_schema', 'binary_upgrade', 'pg_toast') AND  c.oid >=
16384)   OR (n.nspname = 'pg_catalog' AND     relname IN
('pg_largeobject', 'pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index',
'pg_largeobject_metadata', 'pg_largeobject_metadata_oid_index') ));
ERROR:  operator does not exist: name !~ unknown
LINE 1: ...disready IS DISTINCT FROM false AND   ((n.nspname !~ '^pg_te...
                                                             ^
HINT:  No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You
might need to add explicit type casts.


----

Why would

"ERROR:  operator does not exist: name !~ unknown"

Come up ?

Any way to work around this?


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading from 9.2 to 9.3 causes performance degradation
Next
From: Frank Foerster
Date:
Subject: Is it possible to "pip" pg_dump output into new db ?