Re: Avoid stack frame setup in performance critical routines using tail calls - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Avoid stack frame setup in performance critical routines using tail calls
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvqkSvmf0MveV2p13LFB=-SF1FZfx2WgGA=i2a+pMZO=ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Avoid stack frame setup in performance critical routines using tail calls  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Avoid stack frame setup in performance critical routines using tail calls
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 00:29, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I switched over to working on doing what you did in 0002 for
> generation.c and slab.c.
>
> See the attached patch which runs the same test as in [1] (aset.c is
> just there for comparisons between slab and generation)
>
> The attached includes some additional tuning to generation.c:

I've now pushed this.

David

> [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqss7-a9c51nj+f9xyAr15wjLB6teHsxPe-NwLCNqiJbg@mail.gmail.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Next
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: a wrong index choose when statistics is out of date