Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvpNBrz5Y2jq9hh03i-xjQpg+n1MDChFeQCQaNMWbxci4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to apply worker misses closing partition leaves  ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Don't call ereport(ERROR) from recovery target GUC assign hooks
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 at 14:12, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Thanks for updating the patch. They basically LGTM, but I suggest
> you to unify changes in 013_partition.pl.

OK, now pushed. I had misassumed the purpose of the ok() message and
had thought it was a failure text to display, rather than a test name.

I did reword it slightly as I didn't like the double negative of "no unclosed".

Thanks for the report and patch.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping NULL keys when uniqueifying a semijoin's RHS
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: how to run the equivalent of 'make install check-world' with meson