On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 00:44, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 12:32:39AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > I see both of these are limited to 64 on windows. Won't those fail on Windows?
>
> Yes, thanks, they would. I would just cut the range numbers from the
> expected output here. This does not matter in terms of coverage
> either.
Sounds good.
> x> I also wondered if it would be worth doing #define MAX_JOBS somewhere
> > away from the option parsing code. This part is pretty ugly:
>
> Agreed as well. pg_dump and pg_restore have their own idea of
> parallelism in parallel.{c.h}. What about putting MAX_JOBS in
> parallel.h then?
parallel.h looks ok to me.
David
