Re: Rearchitecting for storage - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Matthew Pounsett
Subject Re: Rearchitecting for storage
Date
Msg-id CAAiTEH-3PmV=-wHFf6JDxP+k6g7zNPSFAAPHBwUCAd9x6PGtyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rearchitecting for storage  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
List pgsql-general


On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 21:59, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote:
>

Now might be a good time to consider splitting the database onto multiple computers.  Might be simpler with a mid-range database, then your plan for the future is "add more computers".

Hmm... yes.  Range partitioning seems like a possible way forward.  I hadn't considered that yet.  We might hold that back for when a dual-head approach (server + jbod) can't scale anymore, but I think that's a long way in the future.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Pounsett
Date:
Subject: Re: Rearchitecting for storage
Next
From: Matthew Pounsett
Date:
Subject: Re: Rearchitecting for storage