Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Coleman
Subject Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date
Msg-id CAAaqYe-=w0RaadtaTxfwuVa7GK+8QS7D51YzmfJLX9YZGfqc4A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:25 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch has been marked as WoA since end of November, and there has
> been no discussion/reviews since then :-( Based on off-list discussion
> with James I don't think that's going to change in this CF, so I'll move
> it to the next CF.
>
> I plan to work on the planner part of this patch before 2020-03, with
> the hope it can still make it into 13.

In that off-list discussion I'd mentioned to Tomas that I would still
like to work on this, just my other responsibilities at work have left
me little time to work on the most important remaining part of this
(the planner parts) since that requires a fair amount of focus and
time.

That being said, the patch also needs some more work on improving
EXPLAIN ANALYZE output (perhaps min/max/mean or median of
memory usage number of groups in each sort mode), and I think it's far
more feasible that I can tackle that piecemeal before the next CF.

James



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: allow online change primary_conninfo
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Error message inconsistency