Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From amul sul
Subject Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Date
Msg-id CAAJ_b95_RokvJ0vSYq2DTNTm27n6s_vfzVpHNL+WzKOtV7GRXw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> The third paragraph may be redundant, I'm a bit inclined to leave it for kindness and completeness.  The attached
revisedpatch just correct the existing typo (large -> larger).
 
>

I am not agree to having this paragraph either, I'll leave the
decision to committer.

> I'll change the status to needs review.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Regards,
Amul Sul



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: IPv6 link-local addresses and init data type