Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Date
Msg-id 019edd7b-0321-8dd6-af31-df86cf1cd5d1@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/7/16 12:43 AM, amul sul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> The third paragraph may be redundant, I'm a bit inclined to leave it for kindness and completeness.  The attached
revisedpatch just correct the existing typo (large -> larger).
 
>>
> 
> I am not agree to having this paragraph either, I'll leave the
> decision to committer.
> 
>> I'll change the status to needs review.
> 
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: function xmltable
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Mail thread references in commits