> Also, I suspect that there might be some concerns about the API changes. > While it should be a very easy fix, that seems likely to break a lot of > extensions. > I don't know if it's possible to make this stuff backward > compatible, and I also don't know if we really want to, as that'll both > introduce more complexity and keep folks using the old API.
Yeah, I'm not sure that would be worth the extra complexity and using the old API would "keep" the issue we're trying to solve here.
I don't think we should be worried that much by the number of extensions impacted but more about the change complexity and it looks pretty simple.
So, I don't think we should worry that much in that regard.
