Re: Usage of ProcessConfigfile in SIGHUP_Handler - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lakshmi Narayana Velayudam
Subject Re: Usage of ProcessConfigfile in SIGHUP_Handler
Date
Msg-id CAA4pTnJCKav=2WYyLEc+eiQO0FEGFfrRqNsUOY4aMPynUk7H3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Usage of ProcessConfigfile in SIGHUP_Handler  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Usage of ProcessConfigfile in SIGHUP_Handler
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 8:46 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think this is no longer true as of v16, thanks to commit 7389aad [0].

My Bad Nathan, was looking at PG 11, 14 codes. Just to be sure, calling ProcessConfigFile is a bug from a signal handler is a bug, right? Since it uses AllocSetContextCreate & also GUC variables changes might not be visible in regular flow.

I saw the discussion of the commit but couldn't conclude from the discussion that it was changed due to ProcessConfigFIle. 

Regards,
Narayana 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm.
Next
From: "Amonson, Paul D"
Date:
Subject: RE: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm.