Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LxEwP=kr_t3TPxHjXcd+TzyhnHruNj22kXHqYJEePDdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 10:07 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
>
> I also still think that _worker shouldn't be part of any of the naming
> here.
>

Okay, the other options that comes to mind for this are:
pg_subscription_replication_error, or
pg_subscription_lreplication_error, or pg_subscription_lrep_error? We
can use similar naming at another place (view) if required.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats