Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LejA99FtA7AnJjuQJuWn=Lf01AOk6ysfSdjdvx5Kr=Tg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:14 AM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for updating the patch. Yeah MAXDEADTUPLES is better than
> what I did in the previous version patch.
>

Would you like to resubmit your vacuumdb utility patch for this
enhancement?  I see some old version of it and it seems to me that you
need to update that patch.

+ if (optarg != NULL)
+ {
+ parallel_workers = atoi(optarg);
+ if (parallel_workers <= 0)
+ {
+ pg_log_error("number of parallel workers must be at least 1");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ }

This will no longer be true.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Next
From: "asaba.takanori@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Complete data erasure