On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 1:28 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 09:31:36AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:41 PM Jacob Champion
> > <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > > I know it's okay, but I *want* to backpatch, and I would have
> > > yesterday except for your email. Does that raise concerns or cause
> > > problems in practice?
> >
> > As far as I understand it shouldn't break community norms either way.
> > Also, as per my knowledge there is no clear guidance for such patches.
> > It would be good if other committer also shares their view so we can
> > also learn and take same action in future. This feature is present
> > since PostgreSQL-13 and no real user has reported this problem. It is
> > possible that people using this feature are already use to it using
> > this feature that it doesn't matter much to them either way. Unless
> > someone else responds, I think you can do what you see good to deal
> > with this case.
>
> If it is just a wording improvement, I usually do master only. If it is
> inaccurate/unclear/not-understandable, I would backpatch to all
> releases.
>
IIUC, multiple people in this thread felt that it is a wording
improvement because current text is unclear. So, if we have to follow
what you do, it should be backpatched.
Jacob, would you like to take care of this still?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
