Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LHN6j3cR3wo0vN7+hzKW12oDOxj1yEcuN8yKkegyXPBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-18 20:14:07 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > I have done some
> > tests on Windows with 0003 patch which includes running the regressions
> > (vcregress check) and it passes.  Will look into it tomorrow once again and
> > share if I find anything wrong with it, but feel to proceed if you want.
>
> Thanks for the testing thus far! Let's see what the buildfarm has to
> say.
>

Won't the new code needs to ensure that ResetEvent(latchevent) should get called in case WaitForMultipleObjects() comes out when both pgwin32_signal_event and latchevent are signalled at the same time?


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: logger process infinite loop
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Weighted Stats