Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Date
Msg-id A8DA97CC-BBAB-4AD4-B8D4-415AF9AC76F9@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
List pgsql-hackers

On March 18, 2016 11:32:53 PM PDT, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
>wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-03-18 20:14:07 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> > I have done some
>> > tests on Windows with 0003 patch which includes running the
>regressions
>> > (vcregress check) and it passes.  Will look into it tomorrow once
>again
>and
>> > share if I find anything wrong with it, but feel to proceed if you
>want.
>>
>> Thanks for the testing thus far! Let's see what the buildfarm has to
>> say.
>>
>
>Won't the new code needs to ensure that ResetEvent(latchevent) should
>get
>called in case WaitForMultipleObjects() comes out when both
>pgwin32_signal_event and latchevent are signalled at the same time?

WaitForMultiple only reports the readiness of on event at a time, no?


-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Weighted Stats
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794