Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KnXoeypmFn02Ht60mD92kAO00gA=jKXkY7sjASo9r21Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  ("tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:15 PM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com
<tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 12:32 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I decided to keep this part of the docs as it is and fixed a few other
> > minor comments raised by you and Peter. Additionally, I have bumped
> > the PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID. I'll push this patch tomorrow unless there
> > are any other major comments.
> >
>
> Thanks for your patch. I have finished the review/test for this patch.
> The patch LGTM.
>

Pushed.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?
Next
From: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Logical replication timeout problem