Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1K0UJswCRf81WwJFO4H=+ZvbmKTNhAps-NkdmHRsq1GnQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We didn't found any issue with the above testing.
>
> Great!  I've committed the latest version of the patch, with some
> cosmetic changes.
>

Thanks a lot.  I have noticed that the test case patch for "snapshot
too old" is not committed.  Do you want to leave that due to timing
requirement or do you want me to submit it separately so that we can
deal with it separately and may take an input from Kevin?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Suppress Clang 3.9 warnings
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New procedural language