Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaRdW81yX1o+QkWAMAoC_pO=nXxTbkWFmXuChGhOAdBJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We didn't found any issue with the above testing.
>>
>> Great!  I've committed the latest version of the patch, with some
>> cosmetic changes.
>>
>
> Thanks a lot.  I have noticed that the test case patch for "snapshot
> too old" is not committed.  Do you want to leave that due to timing
> requirement or do you want me to submit it separately so that we can
> deal with it separately and may take an input from Kevin?

I've committed that now as well.  Let's see what the buildfarm thinks.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes