On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 1:21 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 5:41 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 12:23 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Can you share an example of such a case?
> >
>
> My example was using 'publication relation' (not 'publication excluded
> relation') and I've already shared it.
>
> But that bug (?) already exists because this logic appears only aware
> of PUBLICATIONRELMAP rels and is not accounting for FOR ALL TABLES
> etc, so it reports an error like
> ERROR: "t1" is not a published relation of publication "pub"
> even though table public.t1 does exist and really is a published
> relation of pub.
>
Right, but it is a different case as discussed. So, I would still
prefer to keep the same message to keep the code simple. Also, I would
like to push this patch after changing the Assert location as pointed
by Nisha unless you or others have any other comment.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.