On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 3:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 2:35 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> >
> > I understand that this is a minimal fix, and for that it seems OK, but I
> > think the surrounding style is rather baroque. This code can be made
> > simpler. Here's my take on it.
> >
>
> We don't have a lock on the relation, so if it gets dropped
> concurrently, it won't behave sanely. For example, get_rel_name() will
> return NULL which seems incorrect to me.
>
It seems to me that we have a similar coding pattern in ExecGrant_Relation().
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
