Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JbXWy72=ZpzkOiaW+UhZs5nY4Aa7u4Lr=HHkWOOcj9jA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small fix to postgresql.conf.sample's comment on max_parallel_workers  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:39 AM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> While scanning over postgresql.conf I happened to notice something
> that didn't ring quite true about max_parallel_workers. The comment
> confuses worker_processes with parallel workers.
>

+1.  How about changing the description of
max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes,
limited by max_parallel_workers"?


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enabling replication connections by default in pg_hba.conf
Next
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] adding an immutable variant of to_date