Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JMHh_06gk5GFRkL2RYivwPAsS85zuvqOmG86MeOxFR1g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
>> Yes, I also share this opinion, the shm attach failures are due to
>> randomization behavior, so sleep won't help much.  So, I will change
>> the patch to use 100 retries unless people have other opinions.
>
> Sounds about right to me.
>

Okay.  I have changed the retry count to 100 and modified few comments
in the attached patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, soculicidae is *still* broken)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump ignoring information_schema tables which usedin Create Publication.