Try
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JKMSLfnxWE7X5DyY2v962s=Cz3kh=JPL2NiO+=VRG9qw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 3:51 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've reviewed the 0001 patch and it looks good to me.
>

Thanks, I have pushed the 0001 patch.

 The patch still
> has XXX comments at several places. Do we want to keep all of them
>

Yes, those are primarily the ideas for future optimization and or
special notes for some not so obvious design decisions.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: stats.sql might fail due to shared buffers also used by parallel tests
Next
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Re: IndexAmRoutine aminsertcleanup function can be NULL?