Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much?
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+oz4GHePO0OFkTP6u1t1xRP0LpPW7MULxH2ufk8r0TdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:46 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 08:42, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > To resolve the BF
> > > failure, I still feel, we should just recreate the subscription. This
> > > is a pre-existing problem and we can track it via a separate patch
> > > with a test case targetting such failures.
> >
> > +1 for going with recreation of the subscription, the changes for this
> > are available at [1].
> > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1hLZW4H4Z61swK6WPW6pcNcjzXqw%3D6NqG7e-RMtkFaZA%40mail.gmail.com
> >
>
> Tom, and others, does anyone still object to going ahead with an idea
> by just changing the test to recreate the subscription to silence BF
> failures for this test?
>

Seeing no objections, I have pushed the required test changes to silence the BF.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby