On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 6:30 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:08 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 1:20 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here are some comments:
> > >
> > > Why do we need SyncTableStartWrapper() and ApplyLoopWrapper()?
> > >
> >
> > I have given this comment to move the related code to separate
> > functions to slightly simplify ApplyWorkerMain() code but if you don't
> > like we can move it back. I am not sure I like the new function names
> > in the patch though.
>
> Okay, I'm fine with moving this code but perhaps we can find a better
> function name as "Wrapper" seems slightly odd to me.
>
Agreed.
> For example,
> start_table_sync_start() and start_apply_changes() or something (it
> seems we use the snake case for static functions in worker.c).
>
I am fine with something on these lines, how about start_table_sync()
and start_apply() respectively?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
