Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+48fdJqERACBMUbC5eONrMcDLOii-P_-6J52X1eO-KgQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm not an english-native writer, but I would rephrase this:
> >
> >   We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems the better
> >   to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the execution.
> >
>
> Fair enough.  I will adopt your suggestion before commit.   I'll wait
> for a day or so to see if anyone has more comments.
>

Pushed.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Cy
Date:
Subject: subquery column error causes data destroying equality
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16554: Consistent sequence gaps occuring next day