Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Subject Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
Date
Msg-id 20200725234328.6130c23e@firost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:16:55 +0530
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote:  
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not an english-native writer, but I would rephrase this:
> > >
> > >   We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems the
> > > better to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the
> > > execution. 
> >
> > Fair enough.  I will adopt your suggestion before commit.   I'll wait
> > for a day or so to see if anyone has more comments.
> >  
> 
> Pushed.

Thank you!

Regards,



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16554: Consistent sequence gaps occuring next day
Next
From: tutiluren@tutanota.com
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump seems to be broken in regards to the "--exclude-table-data" option on Windows.