Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John Woltman
Subject Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis
Date
Msg-id CA+wMe6U5QCFFTCxy_1hM=ThUpVdaWzdnQtSFAkn4ngirVCqymw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
According to "dnf info", the repo is pgdg95, which I got from the Postgres website.  Since this looks like a packaging bug and not specifically a Postgres bug, should I submit it pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org?

-John

John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260


On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 06/01/2018 10:06 AM, John Woltman wrote:
I'm attempting to install PostGIS2 (specifically postgis2_95 for Postgres 9.5) on Fedora 28.  When I run ``sudo dnf install postgis23_95`` I get the the following the error:

Error:
   Problem: conflicting requests
      - nothing provides geos36 >= 3.6.2 needed by postgis23_95

Fedora 28 provides GEOS 3.6.1.  Is my issue something that I should bring up to the Fedora maintainers or to whoever's in charge of the Postgres Yum repos?

What repo source are you using for the PostGIS package?



Thank you,
John

John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Guyren Howe
Date:
Subject: Re: Whither 1:1?
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: RPM Packaging Question - Fedora 28 & Postgis