On 06/01/2018 10:27 AM, John Woltman wrote:
> According to "dnf info", the repo is pgdg95, which I got from the
> Postgres website. Since this looks like a packaging bug and not
> specifically a Postgres bug, should I submit it
> pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>?
No I would file it here:
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3038
missing packages "proj49" and "geos36" in postgresql 9.5 repository
(dependencies of "postgis24_95")
You will need either a Postgres community account to log in:
https://www.postgresql.org/account/signup/
or third party accounts, see below:
https://www.postgresql.org/account/auth/4/
>
> -John
>
> John Woltman
> TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2018 10:06 AM, John Woltman wrote:
>
> I'm attempting to install PostGIS2 (specifically postgis2_95 for
> Postgres 9.5) on Fedora 28. When I run ``sudo dnf install
> postgis23_95`` I get the the following the error:
>
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides geos36 >= 3.6.2 needed by postgis23_95
>
> Fedora 28 provides GEOS 3.6.1. Is my issue something that I
> should bring up to the Fedora maintainers or to whoever's in
> charge of the Postgres Yum repos?
>
>
> What repo source are you using for the PostGIS package?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> John
>
> John Woltman
> TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
