Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Manuel Rigger
Subject Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column
Date
Msg-id CA+u7OA55uGyfLhEOUqAjyyOwsrKVuv1aeTBFdyboEiVBqrMJdg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks a lot for the fix!

Best,
Manuel

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:35 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Jul-22, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I nearly missed the need for that because of all the noise that
> > check-world emits in pre-v12 branches.  We'd discussed back-patching
> > eb9812f27 at the time, and I think now it's tested enough that doing
> > so is low risk (or at least, lower risk than the risk of not seeing
> > a failure).  So I think I'll go do that now.
>
> I'd like that, as it bites me too, thanks.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikita Glukhov
Date:
Subject: Re: Psql patch to show access methods info
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: make libpq documentation navigable between functions