Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column
Date
Msg-id 20190722193459.GA14241@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column  (Manuel Rigger <rigger.manuel@gmail.com>)
Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Jul-22, Tom Lane wrote:

> I nearly missed the need for that because of all the noise that
> check-world emits in pre-v12 branches.  We'd discussed back-patching
> eb9812f27 at the time, and I think now it's tested enough that doing
> so is low risk (or at least, lower risk than the risk of not seeing
> a failure).  So I think I'll go do that now.

I'd like that, as it bites me too, thanks.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb recommendations
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: errbacktrace