Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLuVa_U6oOZqwXx-ehZC_DVNDj2HvEgWr58DFXviYv4ZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  ("Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 5:43 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > How common is to get a failure?  I know I've run tests under
> > EXEC_BACKEND and not seen any failures.  Not many runs though.
>
> On macOS, failures are extremely common. Sometimes I have to run
> simple tests many times to get even one success. The proposal on the
> table won't help with that problem since it's Linux-specific, but if
> there's any way to do something similar on macOS it would be a _huge_
> help.

Yeah, make check always fails for me on macOS 11.  With the attached
experimental hack, it fails only occasionally (1 in 8 runs or so).  I
don't know why.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Next Steps with Hash Indexes
Next
From: Greg Nancarrow
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side