Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLQb+eWUHRb+_=aQZwSVZTk4FdyxWuv4pm5XiRk7y8j=g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:44 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> I found 0001 patch was committed in de829ddf23, and which added new
> wait event WalrcvExit. This name seems not consistent with other wait
> events. I'm thinking it's better to rename it to WalReceiverExit. Thought?
> Patch attached.

Agreed, your names are better.  Thanks.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)
Next
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions