Re: race condition when writing pg_control - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: race condition when writing pg_control
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJJJOP1jfw4yRqozXghiqtXRH0gisHyNwa+nzCL_xyjcg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: race condition when writing pg_control  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: race condition when writing pg_control  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:24 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 09:11:35PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback.  I've attached a new set of patches.
>
> Thanks for splitting the set.  0001 and 0002 are the minimum set for
> back-patching, and it would be better to merge them together.  0003 is
> debatable and not an actual bug fix, so I would refrain from doing a
> backpatch.  It does not seem that there is a strong consensus in favor
> of 0003 either.
>
> Thomas, are you planning to look at this patch set?

Sorry for my radio silence, I got tangled up with a couple of
conferences.  I'm planning to look at 0001 and 0002 shortly.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan