On 6/2/20 10:51 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 09:29:09PM +0200, Vik Fearing wrote:
>> On 6/2/20 7:25 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I think it would have been helpful if an email explaining this idea for
>>> discussion would have been posted before a patch was generated and
>>> posted.
>>
>> Why?
>
> Because you often have to go backwards to religitate things in the
> patch, rather than opening with the design issues.
Surely that's my problem; and it looks like the only thing I need to
change in this patch is to remove the guc for ANALYZE.
> Our TODO list is
> very clear about this:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
> Desirability -> Design -> Implement -> Test -> Review -> Commit
I can't read everything on this list (far from it), but I don't recall
any other spontaneous patch being chastised for not having the
bikeshedders-at-large do the first two steps before the implementer.
--
Vik Fearing
