Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+BMdcaCe=P-EjMoLTCr3zrrzqbcVE=8h5LyNsSVHKXZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:57 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 02:35:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > There may be a point in enforcing CreateProcess() if
> > CreateRestrictedToken() cannot be loaded, but that would be a security
> > issue if Windows goes crazy as we should always expect the function,
> > so this had better return an error.
>
> And applied as of b1ec7f4.

This reminds me of 24c3ce8f1, which replaced a dlopen()-ish thing with
a direct function call.  Can you just call all these functions
directly these days?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support