Re: Group commit, revised - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Group commit, revised
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMLvNCL0BTU9ZPnFzVYwB5W_s0pXGYq26qHHXjk0GGp5nQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Group commit, revised  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Group commit, revised
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> I committed this. I ran pgbench test on an 8-core box and didn't see any
> slowdown. It would still be good if you get a chance to rerun the bigger
> test, but I feel confident that there's no measurable slowdown.

I asked clearly and specifically for you to hold back committing
anything. Not sure why you would ignore that and commit without
actually asking myself or Peter. On a point of principle alone, I
think you should revert. Working together is difficult if
communication channels are openly ignored and disregarded.

Peter and I have been working on a new version that seems likely to
improve performance over your suggestions. We should be showing
something soon.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Group commit, revised