Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMLsTCmQSmeLaMwMr+Dv_9Fu-+DG0-sojmuY8UxGrct8Xg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 23 April 2014 20:55, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> Logical Decoding begs the questions "of what?". Changeset Extraction
>> is a better name.
>
> Changeset Extraction sounds too geeky to me.  Let me try some
> simplification of it.  Why "set"?  We capture each change; whether
> together they form a set doesn't matter much.  Also, since the changes
> we're talking about occur in the stored data, I propose we use "Data
> Change" rather than "Changeset".  Also, why "Extract"?  We're not
> extracting these changes after the fact -- rather we capture them as
> they transit through the WAL system.
>
> So, I would propose "Data Change Capture".

How about "Change Streaming" ?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4