Re: Sequence Access Method WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJ1xaHEjvVowyQnJYarUsiRLR3DMozyxjRU0ayZ1mK6FA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sequence Access Method WIP  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 15 November 2013 15:08, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:

> I wonder if the level of abstraction is right.

That is the big question and not something to shy away from.

What is presented is not the first thought, by a long way. Andres'
contribution to the patch is mainly around this point, so the seq am
is designed with the needs of the main use case in mind.

I'm open to suggested changes but I would say that practical usage
beats changes suggested for purity.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Next
From: "Erik Rijkers"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes (timings)