On 27 April 2013 20:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 2. The checksum algorithm business. Again, we don't get to tinker with
>> that anymore once we're in beta.
>
> I think it's pretty darn clear that we should change the algorithm,
> and I think we've got a patch to do that. So we should be able to
> resolve this relatively quickly.
I'll be working on this today.
> But +1 for adding a checksum
> algorithm ID to pg_control anyway.
Yes, seems best.
--Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
