Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+BE3ewsgrHm87R2UO=PPHHd2MxMUPecJVXsq37EbVd5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> Surely it can be done online. You'll just need a third state between off and
> on, where checksums are written but not verified, while the cluster is
> scanned.

Are you saying you would accept the patch if we had this?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2