Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 865.1330529584@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com> writes:
> How about removing postgresql_fdw_validator from backend binary, and
> changing dblink to use contrib/postgresql_fdw's validator?  It breaks
> some backward compatibility and requires contrib/postgresql_fdw to be
> installed before using contrib/dblink with foreign servers, but ISTM
> that it doesn't become so serious.

I don't think that creating such a dependency is acceptable.
Even if we didn't mind the dependency, you said yourself that
contrib/postgresql_fdw's validator will accept stuff that's not
appropriate for dblink.

If we don't think postgresql_fdw_validator belongs in core after all,
we should just move it to dblink.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2